Archive for the “Personality” Category

A Guardian interview with the world-renowned architect I. M. Pei who has designed several iconic buildings in Singapore.

The Pei master

He is one of the world’s greatest architects, whose stunning buildings have sparked both wonder and controversy. IM Pei, now in his 90s, talks to Jonathan Glancey

It is good to learn from the ­ancients,” says IM Pei with a smile. “I’m a bit of an ancient ­myself. They had a lot of time to think about architecture and landscape. Today, we rush ­everything, but architecture is slow, and the landscapes it sits in even slower. It needs the time our political systems won’t allow.”

Impeccably mannered and ­quietly spoken, Pei, now 92, has walked an ­architectural tightrope for half a ­century. Marrying ancient and modern, he has created buildings as influential as the trapezoid-shaped east wing of Washington’s National Gallery of Art, as ambitious as the Bank of China’s soaring HQ in Hong Kong, and as controversial as the Pyramide du ­Louvre in Paris. He has won pretty much every prize his profession has to offer; last month he was presented with the prestigious royal gold medal for ­architecture, a gift of the Queen, ­presented by the Royal Institute for British Architects. “A wonderful honour,” he says, when we meet in London’s Mandarin Oriental hotel, “for someone who hasn’t really built here.”

Born in Canton, south-east China, in 1917, Pei is the son of a banker and an artistic mother, who would take him to see dreamy Chinese gardens and ­mountainside shrines. “These have always been the most important ­inspiration to me as an architect,” says Pei. “I have never forgotten those gardens: wonderful marriages of ­man-made and natural design. I’ve come back to them again and again; they are my guide as much as the work of Le Corbusier and Mies van der Rohe, who I admired as a young architect newly arrived in the US.”

Despite being offered a place at ­Oxford, the lure of America proved too strong for the young Pei. “I liked the America of Bing Crosby, Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton – it was all a dream, of course, but a very alluring dream for a young man from Canton.” It drew him to San Francisco, and from there to a string of east coast universities, where he studied under Walter Gropius and Marcel Breuer. His intention had been to return to China, but war broke out and he stayed on to become a US ­citizen, setting up his own practice in 1960.

A rose-red vision in the Rockies

Pei’s reputation was made with the opening, in 1967, of his bold laboratories for the National Centre for Atmospheric Research in Colorado. Clad in local stone that goes from pink to rose-red to ruddy brown with the passing sun, these geometric labs look and feel like an extension of the Rocky Mountains; yet they are defiantly man-made, right down to the slits and chutes cut into their walls. “When I first came to this awe-­inspiring landscape,” says Pei, “it was as if I was standing with my mother again, on a sacred mountainside in China.” This being Colorado, though, he looked for inspiration locally. “I ­visited the nearby Indian pueblos,” he says, referring to the 13th-century Native American cliff dwellings, “and absorbed their forms and structure.”

Pei was 50 when the labs opened; architecture, as he says, shouldn’t be hurried. “As a young man, of course I had been looking for something new, even revolutionary. I knew what Le Corbusier was doing. I wanted to go his way. But, after some years, I began to think differently. I became interested in a modern architecture that made connections to place, history and ­nature. Modern architecture needed to be part of an evolutionary, not a ­revolutionary, process.”

The infamous Louvre pyramid

Pei went from strength to strength with commissions for Washington’s National Gallery of Art and the John F Kennedy Memorial Library in Boston. The former exhibits the powerful, elemental forms that characterise his mature work; the mere fact of being commissioned for the latter shows Pei’s standing in his adopted country. His most charismatic work, though, was commissioned far from America. Twenty years ago, Pei unveiled two of his finest buildings: the Bank of China Tower in Hong Kong, and the underground lobbies of the Louvre in Paris capped with his famous (some might say infamous) pyramid.

The tower is one of the most exciting and elegant of all recent skyscrapers. Intended as a symbol of the new, ultra-capitalist People’s Republic, the building was a special one for the architect. His father had worked for the Bank of China long before it was taken into state control, while Pei, educated by Christian missionaries at Shanghai’s St John’s Middle School, had long sided with Chinese ­nationalists rather than Mao’s communists. Shortly before the opening of the tower, Pei wrote a powerful editorial for the New York Times condemning the ­Tiananmen Square massacre of 1989, which he saw as a sign that the image China wanted to project to the world – partly through his cool, modern tower – was ­drastically out of step with the reality of life for the country’s people.

Yet the tower, with its beautifully expressed, zig-zagging steel frame, rises out of the density of Hong Kong with a confidence and ­elegance that places it above the brutal nature of ­politics. It was the island’s tallest building when it opened in 1990, and it still ranks among the finest ­additions to the city, a ­majestic peak in an urban mountain range.

The Louvre pyramid stirred even deeper emotions, and huge ­controversy. Commissioned as one of President ­Mitterrand’s grands projets in 1985, this ingenious structure – at once ethereal and crystalline, ancient and ­modern – has slowly won over most of its ­detractors. The tip of an architectural iceberg, it forms the entrance to the cavernous Pei-designed lobbies below. “I hoped the controversy would die down quickly,” says Pei. “Perhaps I was a little optimistic. But, you know, the choice of the pyramid was not some personal idiosyncrasy. Paris is a city of pyramids, from the time when ­Napoleon [after whom the court the pyramid rises from is named] became fascinated by Egyptian architecture, after his military campaign along the Nile.” What’s more, the Cour ­Napoleon is the urban equivalent of a desert plain. Pei’s pyramid rises from it as purposefully and fittingly as its massive stone predecessors do from the sands of Giza.

Today, steering well away from ­controversy, Pei is working quietly on a Shinto temple in Kyoto, close to the extraordinary Miho Museum, which sits half-buried in the rugged, misty landscape of the Shiga mountains. “It will be a fusion of ancient feeling and contemporary design,” he says. “You know, the first decent ­building I did with my own practice was a chapel in Taiwan.” This was the Luce Memorial Chapel. Designed in 1954 and ­completed nine years later, it’s a ­stunning, tent-like concrete structure with overlapping roofs that look like stylised leaves falling from the canopy of some sacred grove.

“I think I must be coming full ­circle,” says Pei. Perhaps he is. From a Christian chapel in Taiwan to a Shinto temple in Japan, via some of the most impressive and – albeit unintentionally – ­controversial buildings of the past 50 years, Pei, the most ­unpolemical of men, has met the ­challenges of ­architecture at all levels. Somehow, though, I think he would still like to design a garden ­studded with modern ­pavilions that would ­complement (he is not ­interested in rivalling or ­bettering) the place that has so ­inspired him, the Taoist Lion Grove Garden in Suzhou, with its ­poetically named buildings: the ­Standing-in-the-Snow Hall, Faint ­Fragrance Dim Shadow Tower and True Delight ­Pavilion. He acknowledges this by simply saying: “In ­another life, I might be a gardener. How wonderful it must be to design such gardens.”

Pei says his toughest ever ­commission was the Museum of ­Islamic Art in ­Qatar, which opened in 2008. How could he distil ­centuries of Islamic ­design into one building? He found the answer when he visited the serene, ninth-century mosque of Ahmad ibn Tulun in Cairo. Its ancient elemental forms, and its ­precise use of shadows thrown by the baking sun, found a new life in Pei’s hard-edged, geometrically bold ­museum, set on an artificial island 60 metres off the Doha waterfront.

Pei, after all, is a great believer in continuity. Married for nearly 70 years, he has four children, two of them ­architects. As we talk, he displays a huge ­admiration for the ­longevity of his ­fellow royal gold medal ­winner, Oscar Niemeyer, the ­Brazilian designer of ­cities the world over. ­”Oscar is still a radical,” he says. “He’s still at work, every day, at the age of 102. Wow! ­Perhaps I’m not so ­ancient after all.”

Comments No Comments »

Malaysia’s The Star reported that the country’s The Information Communication and Culture Ministry has proposed to designate a day as Tunku Abdul Rahman Day to commemorate the life and works of Malaysia’s first prime minister.

To remember and not forget is part and parcel of any community’s efforts in ensuring its continuity in times of change. Everyone wants to remember the good things, the good people – or to want to be remembered well. But to remember is also a double-edged sword – it does not merely bring the “good” memories to the fore. Take for instance, Racial Harmony Day (or any of its equivalent in the world). While it is a day to remember and celebrate harmonious living among different groups of people, it is also a stark reminder of the discords and hostility. To commemorate the life of a person is also to remember (from other points of view) his/her foes, enemies and perhaps the not-so-good things of the person.

Regardless of which, remember begets other remembering, which can only be for the better of the historians.

Comments No Comments »

STRAITS TIMES
Home > Prime News > Story
Oct 14, 2009

A STRAITS TIMES EXCLUSIVE

Chin Peng: Let me return to Perak
Former communist leader, now 85, has lost legal fight, but says he wants to die in his birthplace
By Leslie Lopez, Senior Regional Correspondent

BANGKOK: Mr Ong Boon Hua turns 85 in two weeks and there is only one fight left in him. He wants the Malaysian government to let him return to Perak so he can die at his birthplace.

But Kuala Lumpur wants nothing of it.

Mr Ong is better known as Chin Peng, the notorious leader of the Malayan Communist Party (MCP) who eluded arrest for decades and was responsible for the gruesome deaths of many innocent civilians and servicemen during the often brutal insurrection that began in 1948 and lasted well into the 1980s.

Last month, he lost his latest battle in court for the right to return but he intends to appeal again, he told The Straits Times this week in a rare face-to-face interview.

It is a fight that has spanned over half a decade and will continue a while yet, as Chin Peng remains a controversial figure in Malaysia.

When he appeared at the interview though, his reputation as the nefarious leader who directed Malaysia’s most vicious insurrection did not seem to square with the big old man in a long-sleeved green shirt.

He emerged from a specially fitted van with a swivel wheelchair, aided on both sides by relatives. As he shuffled to the dimly lit hotel lobby, Chin Peng looked more like a contented grandfather.

The former communist leader claimed he would not find peace until he could perform his filial duties of visiting the graves of his elders. He wants to return to Sitiawan, a small town in Perak better known for its conversion of old buildings into concrete magnets for birds whose nests are used to make the popular Chinese soup.

Turning to a fellow resident of Sitiawan at lunch, Chin Peng tried to recollect memories of his birthplace. The post office and police station were still where they stood, he was told. But his Methodist kindergarten was now a church for Tamil-speaking Christians.

Talk turned to his father’s bicycle shop.

‘We had shops in other towns in Perak,’ he said, adding that the two-wheelers were the chief mode of transport back in those days.

Wearing a grin, he reminisced about how as a communist operative, he cycled from his home to the coastal town of Lumut to meet British military operatives who had arrived by submarine during their joint operations against the Japanese army in World War II. ‘I used the trunk roads and then the estate roads to avoid being spotted. I cycled everywhere.’

Fifty years later, Chin Peng remains unrepentant.

He has not abandoned his communist beliefs and he does not regret the armed struggle. But he believes people will accept his homecoming.

‘There is no use to dwell in the past. All I want is that the Malaysian government honours the agreements we signed,’ he said during the meeting in Bangkok, where he now lives on his own.

Speaking softly and slowly and with his arms crossed over his ample belly, he added: ‘I think if I had a chance to talk to the public directly, I can convince them that my return won’t pose a problem but could help the situation.’

History lessons in Malaysian schools often recount how the communist forces slit throats and beheaded innocent civilians who ratted on the MCP to the authorities. Allowing the former MCP leader to return would infuriate wide swathes of the Malaysian public.

But a more gentle commentary about him is also emerging.

To hear supporters and admirers tell it, Chin Peng’s story is one of self-sacrifice, a striking tale of a man who played crucial roles in two guerilla struggles – against the Japanese during World War II and later the British – to free what was then Malaya from its occupying forces.

The Communist Party of Malaya (CPM) – the later incarnation of the MCP – and the Malaysian government signed a peace agreement in December 1989.

Many of the former MCP members have resettled in Malaysia but Chin Peng remains blacklisted.

An official request to return, in 2004, was rejected by then Premier Abdullah Badawi on the grounds that Chin Peng was ’still believed to have connections with an organisation promoting violence and terrorism’.

Last month, the Kuala Lumpur High Court refused to hear arguments on whether the Malaysian government had reneged on the agreement with the CPM. The court also classified the suit brought by Chin Peng against the Malaysian government as a defamation action against a Cabinet minister and dismissed his legal action.

Chin Peng’s lawyers said they plan to appeal and are also considering taking similar court action in Thailand, where the agreement was signed two decades ago, and the International Court of Justice.

During the interview, Chin Peng himself was reluctant to answer why he thought the Malaysian government did not want him to return.

Political analysts say that the Malaysian government fears that Chin Peng’s return could upset the country’s politically powerful ethnic Malay nationalist groups and raise tensions with the Chinese community because the majority of the former Communists were Chinese.

Whether he gets his wish or not, this figure from the past is not going quietly into the night.

ljlopez@sph.com.sg

Highlights of Dec 2, 1989 agreement to terminate hostilities
# The Malaysian government and Communist Party of Malaya (CPM) will cease armed activities and former members of the guerilla movement will swear allegiance to the Malaysian Constitution and the King.
# The CPM will disband all armed units in Malaysia and Thailand, while Malaysia shall allow members of Malaysian origin to return. Those not of Malaysian origin can return only if permitted.
# Those who settle down in Malaysia must pledge loyalty to the King and Constitution, while the government will not apply the Internal Security Act or any other law on them for past activities.
# The government will allow former CPM members who settle down in Malaysia to participate in political activities.

Chin Peng’s biography

OCT 21, 1924: Ong Boon Hua was born in Sitiawan, Perak.

1940-1945: Now known as Chin Peng, Ong joins the Malayan Communist Party (MCP) during World War II and is recruited into the Malayan People Anti-Japanese Army, which joins forces with the British to fight the Japanese.

1945-1947: After the Japanese surrender in 1945, Chin Peng is dissuaded by the MCP leadership from carrying out a campaign to block the British from returning to Malaya. He and seven others receive the prestigious Order of the British Empire award for their contributions to the war effort and the MCP is recognised by the British as a lawful political party.

JUNE 1948: Three British planters are killed in Sungei Siput and a State of Emergency is declared. Chin Peng leads the MCP in an armed struggle against the British, and the MCP is declared illegal. The Emergency ends in 1960, when the defeated party withdraws to the Malaysian-Thai border and regroups as the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM).

FEBRUARY 1989: Tripartite Peace Talks between the governments of Malaysia and Thailand and the CPM begin in Phuket.

DECEMBER 1989: Peace Treaty is signed in Hat Yai, but Chin Peng stays in exile.

Tags:

Comments No Comments »

Some of the most iconic photographs of Mao Zedong came from the lens of his personal photographer of 12 years, Hou Bo.

In conjunction with the anniversary of China’s communist revolution, Hous’  interview with Clifford Coonan is published in Independent.

A video of her interview, in Mandarin, can be found on the Guardian website.

Tags: ,

Comments No Comments »

In 2008, the Canadian version of the geneology series, Who Do You Think You Are?, aired an episode that linked Canada and Singapore.

It featured the story of Margaret Trudeau, former wife of the late Canadian Prime Minister, Pierre Elliott Trudeau.

It turned out that Magaret was the great great great great granddaughter of Major William Farquhar. She was descended from Farquhar’s eldest daughter, Esther who married Francis James Bernard. Bernard was the island’s Police Officer. He was also the publisher and editor of the short-lived Singapore Chronicle, Singapore’s very first newspaper.

Esther died in 1838 and was buried at the Fort Canning Cemetery. Click here to see a rubbing of her tombstone.

Comments No Comments »